Democrats are tougher on national security - Page 3 - Gianni's Bar and Grille. Guns and shit. And Bourbon. And occasional side boob

30th March 2006, 22:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by maladjusted


	You can't be older than 13?

Nah...................my 13 year-old only watches FoxNews, I try to get balance in my life.

Speaking of balanced

Quote:

Originally Posted by maladjusted


	http://www.issues2000.org/Domestic/J...un_Control.htm

(On The Issues: EVERY POLITICAL LEADER ON EVERY ISSUE)

Who underwrote that? The NRA? or THE BUSH FOR PRESIDENT committee? (I missed wher the compiler owned up to it) I didn't realize McCain's issues were so confined.

30th March 2006, 23:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by incognito


	Nah...................my 13 year-old only watches FoxNews, I try to get balance in my life.

Sucking cock AND taking it up the ass does not qualify as balance.

Quote:


	Speaking of balanced (On The Issues: EVERY POLITICAL LEADER ON EVERY ISSUE) Who underwrote that? The NRA? or THE BUSH FOR PRESIDENT committee? (I missed wher the compiler owned up to it) I didn't realize McCain's issues were so confined.

Are you wearing your hockey helmet you fucking retard?

If you look at the bottom of hte page, there's links to quotes from McCain on lots of issues, not just gun control. Each quote states where it came from, looks like mostly newspaper articles. That site's pretty damn impartial, it just presents the candidate's own words on topics, what exactly is your beef if you can articulate it you vapid twat?

Nebraskababe · 30th March 2006, 23:36

vapid=+25

30th March 2006, 23:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by maladjusted


	what exactly is your beef if you can articulate it you vapid twat?

Nothing Really.........just engaging in spirited discourse,- and you're right, you did say "read all the way to the bottom",- and I didn't.

I just look forward to 2008 with great trepidation. On the republican side you're looking at Santorum, Dr. "SHE LIVES!!" Frist, or McCain. The Dems got Biden (if he runs), and Hillary.

Hondo · 30th March 2006, 23:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by incognito


	Noth and you're right, you did say "read all the way to the bottom",- and I didn't.

Holy shit...you admitted you were in error. What kind of liberal are you anyway?

31st March 2006, 00:19

Liberal? I actually prefer the antiquated term. "Moderate".............. it used to be a political sub-group prior to Jan, 2001.

One thing I'll agree with Maladjusted on,- two party system sucks.

31st March 2006, 10:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by incognito


	Nothing Really.........just engaging in spirited discourse,

No you're not, you are just disagreeing and being a fucking moron. Discourse would occur if you brought something to the table, which you are apparently incapable of doing. You have not presented a single idea worth a shit.

Keep banging those pots together, Mongo.

Quote:


	- and you're right,

Wow, anything else you'd like tell me that I already fucking know?

Quote:


	I just look forward to 2008 with great trepidation.

No POTUS can destroy this nation. We lived through Carter and Clinton.

31st March 2006, 13:12

Where are the gun toting lunatics when you need them? Feinswein, Boxer, Schumer, Pelosi, Kerry, Billary -- how many fucking targets do you need?

Security around Pelosi is bound to be a joke compared to knocking off a former POTUS, where's the disgruntled former military religious whacko w/ teh NRA belt buckle at already?

Nebraskababe · 31st March 2006, 15:10

You know, if you look at all of the politicians in that picture, they look dried up and forlorn. If you look at President Fox on t.v. today, he looks like he's wearing flip flops with a margarita under the podium. Hmm...

iczorro · 31st March 2006, 18:22

That's cause he's president of Mexico. What's the worst that can happen if he fucks up?

31st March 2006, 19:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by maladjusted


	No you're not, you are just disagreeing and being a fucking moron. Discourse would occur if you brought something to the table, which you are apparently incapable of doing. You have not presented a single idea worth a shit.

Actually, all I did was disagree with:

Quote:

Originally Posted by maladjusted


	Except wars in two countries and a huge anti-terror campaign at home in the face of withering attacks from his many opponents w/o the benefit of a helpful press.

9/11 happened and the Bush Administration masterfully exploited the situation and people's sense of patriotism to cowl all detractors, especially the press (and all those opponents in congress). In that regard, Bush, or perhaps Rove, was a frickin' genius.

Please note, I fully supported the action; I'm not saying it was wrong at the time. But to say that Bush had to fight a wave of opposition and an antagonistic press corp at home is fucking retarded.

To suggest that the strong economy and a ballooning (is that a strong enough word) deficit supported by foreign investors is of little concern is niave.

You hated Slick Willy? Fine. I swear to myself every year that the following election day I'm going to vote for someone instead of against someone; but then, what are you gonna do?

Hondo · 31st March 2006, 19:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by incognito


	But to say that Bush had to fight a wave of opposition and an antagonistic press corp at home is fucking retarded.

Step away from the hash pipe dude.

Bush did get a somewhat of a free pass from the press for about a year. That all ended with the run up to the Iraq invasion and he's been spear chucker for them ever since.

1st April 2006, 13:11

<-----------Setting aside hooka

1st April 2006, 13:12

^
|
|
|
Faggot

AnimalChin · 1st April 2006, 13:30

--------->

LOOK OVER THERE

Stiffy · 1st April 2006, 19:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by incognito


	9/11 happened and the Bush Administration masterfully exploited the situation and people's sense of patriotism to cowl* all detractors*

He gave everyone hats?

gilor · 2nd April 2006, 14:12

I didn't know there were leftists on this board. Are there more or just that icognito troll?

2nd April 2006, 16:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by iczorro


	That's cause he's president of Mexico. What's the worst that can happen if he fucks up?

he absconds with 4 billion bucks liek the last one

2nd April 2006, 17:30

^

|
|
|
pencil neck

3rd April 2006, 09:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by incognito


	to say that Bush had to fight a wave of opposition and an antagonistic press corp at home is fucking retarded.?

Around 9/11/02 + 1 second all that support when down the shitter because Bin Laden's head was not on a pike at ground zero and you damn well know it, you patchouli stinkin' cock gobbler.

30th March 2006, 23:36	#43
Nebraskababe Pretend I still look like this... Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Tennessee Posts: 2,925	Re: Democrats are tougher on national security vapid=+25

31st March 2006, 00:19	#46
incognito Posts: n/a	Re: Democrats are tougher on national security Liberal? I actually prefer the antiquated term. "Moderate".............. it used to be a political sub-group prior to Jan, 2001. One thing I'll agree with Maladjusted on,- two party system sucks.

31st March 2006, 13:12	#48
maladjusted Posts: n/a	Re: Not Photoshopped Where are the gun toting lunatics when you need them? Feinswein, Boxer, Schumer, Pelosi, Kerry, Billary -- how many fucking targets do you need? Security around Pelosi is bound to be a joke compared to knocking off a former POTUS, where's the disgruntled former military religious whacko w/ teh NRA belt buckle at already?

31st March 2006, 15:10	#49
Nebraskababe Pretend I still look like this... Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Tennessee Posts: 2,925	Re: Not Photoshopped You know, if you look at all of the politicians in that picture, they look dried up and forlorn. If you look at President Fox on t.v. today, he looks like he's wearing flip flops with a margarita under the podium. Hmm...

31st March 2006, 18:22	#50
iczorro GO TO JAIL I'm this close to silently protesting. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: I'm a vagrant Posts: 2,877	Re: Not Photoshopped That's cause he's president of Mexico. What's the worst that can happen if he fucks up?

1st April 2006, 13:11	#53
incognito Posts: n/a	Re: Democrats are tougher on national security <-----------Setting aside hooka

1st April 2006, 13:12	#54
Hung0v3r Posts: n/a	Re: Democrats are tougher on national security ^ \| \| \| Faggot

1st April 2006, 13:30	#55
AnimalChin DRINK CHEERWINE Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 1,001,028	Re: Democrats are tougher on national security ---------> LOOK OVER THERE

2nd April 2006, 14:12	#57
gilor Registered User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: PA Posts: 52	Re: Democrats are tougher on national security I didn't know there were leftists on this board. Are there more or just that icognito troll? __________________ "How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin."

2nd April 2006, 17:30	#59
incognito Posts: n/a	Re: Democrats are tougher on national security ^ \| \| \| pencil neck