30th March 2006, 22:33 | #41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
Nah...................my 13 year-old only watches FoxNews, I try to get balance in my life. Speaking of balanced
(On The Issues: EVERY POLITICAL LEADER ON EVERY ISSUE) Who underwrote that? The NRA? or THE BUSH FOR PRESIDENT committee? (I missed wher the compiler owned up to it) I didn't realize McCain's issues were so confined. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30th March 2006, 23:08 | #42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
Sucking cock AND taking it up the ass does not qualify as balance.
Are you wearing your hockey helmet you fucking retard? If you look at the bottom of hte page, there's links to quotes from McCain on lots of issues, not just gun control. Each quote states where it came from, looks like mostly newspaper articles. That site's pretty damn impartial, it just presents the candidate's own words on topics, what exactly is your beef if you can articulate it you vapid twat? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30th March 2006, 23:36 | #43 |
Pretend I still look like this...
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,925
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
vapid=+25
|
30th March 2006, 23:51 | #44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
Nothing Really.........just engaging in spirited discourse,- and you're right, you did say "read all the way to the bottom",- and I didn't. I just look forward to 2008 with great trepidation. On the republican side you're looking at Santorum, Dr. "SHE LIVES!!" Frist, or McCain. The Dems got Biden (if he runs), and Hillary. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
30th March 2006, 23:55 | #45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
I'll knock your chicklets hella the fuck out
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Southside Samoya
Posts: 12,541
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
Holy shit...you admitted you were in error. What kind of liberal are you anyway?
__________________
"Some of the most successful relationships are based on lies and deceit. Since that's where they usually end up anyway, it's a logical place to start." Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But it rocks absolutely, too |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
31st March 2006, 00:19 | #46 |
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
Liberal? I actually prefer the antiquated term. "Moderate".............. it used to be a political sub-group prior to Jan, 2001.
One thing I'll agree with Maladjusted on,- two party system sucks. |
31st March 2006, 10:25 | #47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
No you're not, you are just disagreeing and being a fucking moron. Discourse would occur if you brought something to the table, which you are apparently incapable of doing. You have not presented a single idea worth a shit. Keep banging those pots together, Mongo.
Wow, anything else you'd like tell me that I already fucking know?
No POTUS can destroy this nation. We lived through Carter and Clinton. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31st March 2006, 13:12 | #48 |
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Not Photoshopped
Where are the gun toting lunatics when you need them? Feinswein, Boxer, Schumer, Pelosi, Kerry, Billary -- how many fucking targets do you need?
Security around Pelosi is bound to be a joke compared to knocking off a former POTUS, where's the disgruntled former military religious whacko w/ teh NRA belt buckle at already? |
31st March 2006, 15:10 | #49 |
Pretend I still look like this...
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,925
|
Re: Not Photoshopped
You know, if you look at all of the politicians in that picture, they look dried up and forlorn. If you look at President Fox on t.v. today, he looks like he's wearing flip flops with a margarita under the podium. Hmm...
|
31st March 2006, 18:22 | #50 |
GO TO JAIL
I'm *this* close to silently protesting.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: I'm a vagrant
Posts: 2,877
|
Re: Not Photoshopped
That's cause he's president of Mexico. What's the worst that can happen if he fucks up?
|
31st March 2006, 19:32 | #51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
Actually, all I did was disagree with:
9/11 happened and the Bush Administration masterfully exploited the situation and people's sense of patriotism to cowl all detractors, especially the press (and all those opponents in congress). In that regard, Bush, or perhaps Rove, was a frickin' genius. Please note, I fully supported the action; I'm not saying it was wrong at the time. But to say that Bush had to fight a wave of opposition and an antagonistic press corp at home is fucking retarded. To suggest that the strong economy and a ballooning (is that a strong enough word) deficit supported by foreign investors is of little concern is niave. You hated Slick Willy? Fine. I swear to myself every year that the following election day I'm going to vote for someone instead of against someone; but then, what are you gonna do? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31st March 2006, 19:48 | #52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
I'll knock your chicklets hella the fuck out
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Southside Samoya
Posts: 12,541
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
Step away from the hash pipe dude. Bush did get a somewhat of a free pass from the press for about a year. That all ended with the run up to the Iraq invasion and he's been spear chucker for them ever since.
__________________
"Some of the most successful relationships are based on lies and deceit. Since that's where they usually end up anyway, it's a logical place to start." Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But it rocks absolutely, too |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
1st April 2006, 13:11 | #53 |
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
<-----------Setting aside hooka
|
1st April 2006, 13:12 | #54 |
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
^
| | | Faggot |
1st April 2006, 13:30 | #55 |
DRINK CHEERWINE
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,001,028
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
--------->
LOOK OVER THERE |
1st April 2006, 19:21 | #56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Optimus lame.
I'm *this* close to silently protesting.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rock Ridge
Posts: 6,679
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
He gave everyone hats?
__________________
Meh, fuck it |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2nd April 2006, 14:12 | #57 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 52
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
I didn't know there were leftists on this board. Are there more or just that icognito troll?
__________________
"How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin." |
2nd April 2006, 16:10 | #58 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Not Photoshopped
he absconds with 4 billion bucks liek the last one |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2nd April 2006, 17:30 | #59 |
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
^
| | | pencil neck |
3rd April 2006, 09:23 | #60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Democrats are tougher on national security
Around 9/11/02 + 1 second all that support when down the shitter because Bin Laden's head was not on a pike at ground zero and you damn well know it, you patchouli stinkin' cock gobbler. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||